NEXUS Criteria Calculator
Determine if cervical spine imaging is required using the NEXUS 5-criteria low-risk assessment.
About the NEXUS Criteria
Background
The NEXUS (National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study) criteria were developed from a prospective observational study of over 34,000 patients published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2000. The study identified 5 clinical criteria that, when all present, effectively rule out clinically significant cervical spine injury.
The Five Low-Risk Criteria
All 5 criteria must be met to clear the cervical spine without imaging:
- No posterior midline cervical tenderness
- No evidence of intoxication
- Normal level of alertness
- No focal neurological deficit
- No painful distracting injury
Performance Characteristics
- Sensitivity: 99.0% (95% CI: 98.0-99.6%)
- Specificity: 12.9%
- Negative Predictive Value: 99.8%
- 8 injuries missed in 818 patients with injury (0.98%)
Comparison with Canadian C-Spine Rule
A direct comparison study (Stiell et al., NEJM 2003) found the Canadian C-Spine Rule had higher sensitivity (99.4% vs 90.7% in that study) and higher specificity (45.1% vs 36.8%). However, NEXUS remains widely used due to its simplicity. Both are acceptable approaches per NICE guidelines.
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, et al. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(2):94-99. PMID: 10891516
- Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(26):2510-2518. PMID: 14695411
- NICE Guideline NG41. Spinal injury: assessment and initial management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2016 (updated 2023). NICE NG41
- Michaleff ZA, Maher CG, Verhagen AP, et al. Accuracy of the Canadian C-spine rule and NEXUS to screen for clinically important cervical spine injury in patients following blunt trauma: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2012;184(16):E867-E876. PMID: 23048086
NEXUS at a Glance
ALL 5 must be present to CLEAR:
- No midline tenderness
- No intoxication
- Normal alertness (GCS 15)
- No focal neurology
- No distracting injury
Any criterion ABSENT = IMAGE
Distracting Injuries
Examples that may mask neck pain:
- Long bone fractures
- Visceral injuries requiring surgery
- Large lacerations or degloving
- Crush injuries
- Significant burns
- Any severely painful injury
Performance
| Sensitivity | 99.0% |
| Specificity | 12.9% |
| NPV | 99.8% |
| Study Size | 34,069 patients |
NEXUS vs CCR
| NEXUS | CCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | 99.0% | 99.4% |
| Specificity | 12.9% | 45.1% |
| Complexity | Simple | 3-step |
Disclaimer
This calculator is provided for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
- Always seek the advice of a qualified healthcare provider with any questions regarding a medical condition.
- Never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking it because of information from this tool.
- Clinical decision-making should always incorporate the full clinical context, patient preferences, and local protocols.
- The creators of this tool accept no liability for decisions made based on its output.
If you are a patient: please discuss any results with your healthcare provider. This tool is designed for use by medical professionals and may not be appropriate for self-assessment.